martes, 14 de julio de 2015

La importancia de la evaluación como proceso de aprendizaje. Reflexiones para los Docentes.

Lic. Prof. Miriam Giambuzzi


Resumen

La evaluación  nos permite señalar las distintas concepciones que se tienen sobre la sociedad, la escuela, la educación, sobre la tarea docente.
Más importante que evaluar y qué evaluar correctamente, es saber al servicio de qué personas y de qué valores se pone la evaluación. Dado que la evaluación es más un proceso ético que una actividad técnica.
Todos los  aprendizajes están condicionados  por el ambiente o su contexto de aprendizaje y por su propia  motivación.
El aprendizaje no se realiza en forma mecánica, esto es lo que hay que destacar. No son sencillos y lineales estos  procesos de enseñanza y  aprendizaje.
La evaluación debiera ser un medio para conocer, compartir y entender, este maravilloso proceso de enseñar y aprender el cual nos permite transcender en la otredad aceptando la diversidad.



La importancia de la evaluación como proceso de aprendizaje.

En estos últimos años, a mi criterio, la escuela resulta el lugar donde más se evalúa pero es el mismo lugar donde los cambios se hacen más lentamente. Pero la evaluación tiene amplias dimensiones, y es necesario saber que se pretende de ella.
David Nevo (1986) plantea diez dimensiones de la evaluación educativa. Cada una resulta una inagotable fuente de preocupaciones y cuestiones no siempre clarificadas.

1.     ¿Cómo se define la evaluación?
2.     ¿Cuáles son las funciones de la evaluación?
3.     ¿Cuáles son los objetos de la evaluación?
4.     ¿Qué tipos de información deberían ser recogidos en la contemplación de cada objeto?
5.     ¿Qué criterios deberían ser usados para juzgar el mérito y el valor de un objeto evaluado?
6.     ¿Para quién se realiza la evaluación?
7.     ¿Cuál es el proceso para realizar una evaluación?
8.     ¿Qué métodos de indagación deberían ser usados en la evaluación?
9.     ¿Quién debe realizar la evaluación?
10.                       ¿Bajo que patrones debería ser juzgada una evaluación?

Todos estos aspectos tratan un amplio panorama de interrogantes sobre que comprobar en la evaluación que se toma a los alumnos.
“La evaluación educativa es un proceso que, en parte, nos ayuda a determinar si lo que hacemos en las escuelas está contribuyendo a conseguir los fines valiosos o si es antiético a estos fines. Que hay diferentes versiones de lo valioso es indudablemente verdad. Es uno de los factores que hace a la educación más compleja que la medicina…” (Eisner, 1985).
Pero la evaluación, es un proceso que pone en cuestión todas nuestras concepciones sobre la enseñanza y la educación.  La evaluación se convierte en la estructura formal del ámbito  áulico. Todo sucede en virtud de las expectativas y de las consecuencias de la evaluación. Por un lado, los padres  en la mayoría de los casos dan valor a las calificaciones más que al aprendizaje y al esfuerzo; y la sociedad presta menos atención al saber real que a los  diplomas  y calificaciones que acreditan la permanencia  y el éxito de la escuela.
“De esta forma la evaluación en lugar de ser un instrumento al servicio de un sistema de enseñanza se convierte en una finalidad que somete y modela al resto de los elementos. Cuando la evaluación adquiere un valor final, el sistema genera una dinámica que se aleja de los objetivos de formación. Todo se vicia, se distorsiona, se disfuncionaliza” (Pérez Gómez, 1988).
La evaluación es un ejercicio fundamental de comprensión. Para evaluar hay que comprender. La evaluación permite que el docente comprenda que tipo de procesos realiza el alumno. Que es lo que ha comprendido y qué es lo que ha asimilado.
Más importante que evaluar y qué evaluar correctamente, es saber al servicio de qué personas y de qué valores se pone la evaluación. Dado que la evaluación es más un proceso ético que una actividad técnica.
El alumno aprende todo aquello que es capaz de asimilar en un determinado momento. Todo lo que aprende esta en función de lo que ya sabe, de su experiencia, de las expectativas y motivos,  y de  sus deseos. Todos los  aprendizajes están condicionados  por el ambiente o su contexto de aprendizaje y por su propia  motivación.
El aprendizaje no se realiza en forma mecánica, esto es lo que hay que señalar. No son sencillos y lineales estos  procesos de enseñanza y  aprendizaje.
La evaluación de cada educando lleva aparejado su propio ritmo de estudio y de maduración. Este ritmo no es homogéneo para todos los alumnos ni para un mismo alumno en todas sus etapas.
Según Tavernier, (1987), “lejos de ser un modelado pasivo, el aprendizaje significa una asimilación en extremo selectiva de las diversas informaciones procedentes del medio, conectadas entre sí de una manera extraordinariamente personal”.
Por otra parte, de la propia experiencia del  trabajo diario,  del día a día en el aula, se que no resulta fácil poner en marcha procesos de cambios que faciliten una mejora. Nuestro ámbito escolar presenta grandes dificultades arraigadas, más bien anquilosadas que entorpecen la práctica profesional y el contexto organizativo de la escuela. Por ejemplo: la escasez de tiempo, falta de motivación, individualismo profesional, la rutinización institucional, la inversión educativa y  algunas  políticas educativas.
Sería muy interesante pensar en una ruptura hegemónica de la inquietud evaluadora, es decir solo se evalúa al alumno. Esta dimensión jerárquica de la evaluación solo del alumno que no involucra todo el contexto y proceso,  es la que se  debería repensar, con que otras preocupaciones e interrogantes más justos y ambiciosos tendrían que contar la evaluación.

De mitos pedagógicos arraigados no pueden surgir los cambios, el docente seguirá evaluando repitiendo sus rutinas y demandará de los alumnos los cambios que él no está dispuesto a poner en práctica. Sencillamente la evaluación debiera ser un medio para conocer, compartir y entender, este maravilloso proceso de enseñar y aprender el cual nos permite transcender en la otredad aceptando la diversidad.

Transgenic soybeans in Argentina


Decades have been talking, telling and informing the misuse of agrochemicals in Argentina. Since the rapid growth of soybean cultivation, main export of the country, is related to the use of transgenic seeds. Poor application of herbicides and pesticides has consequences for certain sectors of the rural population with very serious health problems.
Since 2003, I have been presenting a field study on Transgenic Soybeans in Argentina. Suffered in Colonia Lomas Senés, located in the province of Formosa, Party Pirané, Argentina.
The number of small producers amounted to 95% of farmers and land tenure 80% of these farmers is precarious, with too small for the development of family plots.
Therefore to achieve greater production in the short term, excessive chemical use in agriculture. Importantly, there are other reasons for using agrochemicals, as competition produced by producers.
In recent years have seen the entry of several production companies, including Farmers ANTA SA, Joint Venture (JV) and Formosa Agricultural Project (FAP), who rent land to produce RRsoya (GM soy) and using pesticides without control of the provincial government, nor national.
For these companies is more profitable to produce RRsoya with the use of pesticides destroying the earth; therefore the production system RRsoya sweeps the floor, taking advantage of the fertile and exhausting stage. Besides this production system is cost effective because it does not use labor, since the machines do everything, maximizing production.
Argentina adopted the model of Monsanto, but the application of safety standards vary, as in the regulation of agriculture predominate the 23 provinces, which have different requirements. The spraying is prohibited within three kilometers populated areas in some provinces, but is allowed 50 meters in others. One third of local authorities do not provide any limit and most have no detailed policies compliance.

Famous Model Monsanto

Argentina was one of the first countries to adopt the new model of biotech agriculture promoted by Monsanto and other US agricultural enterprises.
Instead of rotating the potting soil and spray pesticide, then expect that toxic substances are dispersed before planting, the farmers make "direct seeding" and then sprayed the area without damaging crops that have been genetically modified so that they can tolerate certain chemicals.
Direct seeding requires much less time and money and allows the farmer to make and cultivate crops even in lands that were previously considered uneconomic.
Pests, however, become resistant more quickly, especially when the same chemical genetically modified crops massive substances are applied.
That is why farmers use glyphosate, considered one of the world's safest herbicides, in increasingly higher concentrations and mix it with far more toxic substances such as 2,4, D, used by the US military as was dubbed the "Agent Orange" to deforest the jungles during the Vietnam War.
In 2006, a division of the Argentine Ministry of Agriculture recommended that labels warn that the use of mixtures of glyphosate and toxic substances should be limited to "agricultural areas, away from homes and populated areas." But the recommendation was ignored, according to research by the Auditor General. Therefore, if the excessive use of agrochemicals by farmers, either by lack of education and information; and labor competition, it is added the pollution caused by the Formoseño Agricultural Project (FAP), this resulted in the contamination of at least 23 farms of the Colony and the destruction of 100% of the soils in these fields and water pollution.
The farms crops, have the following abnormalities: anatomical defects of various types, besides physiological symptoms of damage to the plants. These damages are observed in cultivated plants and broadleaf weeds such as cotton, beans, citrus, bananas, cassava, cocklebur, cafecillo, among others. The damage is attributed to the effect of hormone action herbicides used on crops.
In addition to environmental damage, such as pollution and soil depletion, air pollution, contamination of groundwater aquifers; is important to note the damage on the health of the population and livestock.
Such damage occurs by the movement of an agrochemical from an agroecosystem. Which can leave an agroecosystem, on the ground or water.
Volatilization is the most common way in which chemicals are spread between plants of a crop.
The overuse of agrochemicals, produces effects on human health, considering that are toxic and therefore can cause accidents peasants and how many people are in contact with the substances they contain. Acute poisoning may be the most serious consequence that can undergo a person exposed to them. However chronic health effects are of greatest concern because of the large number of consumers with potential risk of suffering. Agrochemical residues (herbicides or plagicidas) in vegetables, fruits, milk and other agricultural products may occur.
Considering the above, the population of Colonia Lomas Senés, has the following symptoms, to direct exposure or potential agrochemicals: skin lesions, piodermis, ringworm, tonsillitis pultáceas, respiratory infections, eczema appearance of skin and irritation eyepiece.
On the other hand, agricultural chemicals, may directly or indirectly affect a wide variety of fish, wildlife and invertebrates not directly exposed to the action of these products. Most plagicidas, for example, contain organophosphates, which produce acute organophosphate-induced neuropathy, organophosphate-induced leukoencephalopathy (cause mortality above 97%), muscarinic syndrome, the main symptoms are: isochoric miosis and reactive, twitching, salivation, sweating, diarrhea, lacrimation, bronchospasm, bradycardia.
Importantly, nitrogen and phosphorus found in most agricultural chemicals, causing major concerns for several reasons:
First, if the nitrates drunk in the water have become nitrites, rarely produce health damage, otherwise, ie if the fit to drink water, has nitrates, serious cusa damage to human and animal health .
This occurs when too much nitrogen is applied to a crop, excess nitrates can not absorb culture tends to seep below the soil by leaching. In the long reach any aquifer or well which are sources of drinking water.
In the Colonia Lomas Senés, sampling water housing (craft punch) were performed as well as, a dam encircling the crops and water drilling, well crafted, regular consumption. The inhabitants of these houses had symptoms of intoxication which were real and chronic potential. Since high concentrations of toxic products, produce effects such as bioaccumulation, altered ecosystems and carcinogenic compounds in drinking water.
Second, excess agricultural chemicals cause excessive algae growth, eutrophication of rivers and lakes, the effects of it are unpleasant taste and odor of water, aesthetic concerns, unbalanced ecosystems and lethal toxins. Samples of the dam of La Colonia
Lomas Senés, showed signs of eutrophication on a smaller scale.
Given the background agrochemicals in Colonia Lomas Senés, is vital to incorporate or develop an environmental education project, to achieve concentización consequences involving the excessive use of agricultural chemicals; both environmental and health.
In 2013, we continued despite all the warnings of scientists and researchers continue to manifest cases in different provinces of our country as a millionaire multinational business grows.
The farmhand Fabián Tomasi was not trained to use pesticides. I had to
fill the spray tank as quickly as possible so that would follow spraying, which often meant showering in toxic substances. Today, at age 47, is a skeleton in life and struggles out of his home in the province of Entre Rios.
The schoolteacher Andrea Druetta lives in the province of Santa Fe, heart of the production area where Argentina soybean and spraying agrochemicals within 500 meters of populated areas is prohibited. But he sprayed soybean planting and 30 meters from his house and his children were sprayed with poison while swimming in the pool.
After the death of her newborn baby by kidney failure, Sofia Gatica made a complaint which led to the first conviction was in Argentina for illegal use of agrochemicals. The verdict last year, however, came too late for its 5,300 residents of Ituzaingó Annex. A government study found alarming levels of agrochemical pollution on earth and in their drinking water, and 80% of the children examined had traces of pesticides in their blood. The US biotech made Argentina the third largest producer of soybeans, but the use of chemicals that fostered the boom beyond the fields of soybeans, cotton and corn. The Associated Press documented dozens of cases where farmers provinces where toxic substances are used in ways that were not foreseen by the regulations identified by science or that were specifically prohibited by law, and in a context of few state controls. The wind carries toxic, which are scattered in schools and homes while they have contaminated water sources. The field hands substances handled without the necessary protective equipment and people store water in containers of pesticides that should have been destroyed.
In Santa Fe, cancer rates are two to four times higher than the national average. In the Chaco, birth defects quadrupled since the use of this biotechnology applied to the field being shot 17 years ago.
"The change in the way we produce, frankly has changed the profile of diseases," said Medardo Avila Vásquez, pediatrician and co-founder of Doctors fumigated Peoples, part of a growing movement demanding the implementation of safe standards in agriculture. "We did lose a fairly healthy population. Now we see a population with high rates of cancer, children born with deformities and diseases were very rare." A nation that was once known for its grass-fed beef has been transformed since 1996, when the company Monsanto, based in St. Louis, Missouri, Argentina convinced that the adoption of its patented seeds and chemicals increase crop yields and reduce the use of pesticides. Today, all the soybean crop and nearly all production of corn and cotton are genetically modified. Areas of soybean tripled and now cover 19 million hectares. The use of pesticides declined at first, but then rebounded and increased ninefold. Of the 34 million liters of 1990 was passed nearly 317 million today, as farmers increased their crop, up to three harvests a year, while the pests became more resistant substances. In general, Argentine farmers apply an estimated 4.3 pounds of chemicals per hectare, more than twice what Americans use, according to an AP analysis of government data and the pesticide industry.
Glyphosate, a key component of Monsanto Roundup pesticide is one of the most used and least toxic of the world to eliminate weeds chemicals. Is safe if properly implemented, as many regulatory agencies, including the US and Europe. The big capitalists defend the position of a written statement, Monsanto said it "does not condone the misuse made of pesticides or violation of any law on the use of pesticides, regulations or court decisions" for this have been enacted . "Monsanto takes seriously the administration of products and communicate regularly with our customers about the proper use of our products," Thomas told the AP Helscher spokesman noted Monsanto.Cabe, A national law requires those who apply chemicals that may threaten the health to take "effective measures to prevent widespread environmental degradation, regardless of cost or outcome measures." But the law was never applied to agriculture, according checked the Auditor General's Office last year.
In response to numerous complaints, the President Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner created in 2009, a commission to investigate thoroughly spraying chemicals. The commission issued a progress report in September of that year saying "sustained performance over time of systematic controls concentrations of herbicide degradation compounds as comprehensive laboratory studies and field involving necessary to the formulations containing glyphosate, as well as his (s) interaction (s) with other agrochemicals, under current conditions of use in our country. " The commission, however, has not met since 2010, according to the Auditor General.
Molecular biologist Andrés Carrasco, University of Buenos Aires, says that chemical cocktails are alarming, but that glyphosate alone can generate health disorders in humans. Found that injection of very low dose level in frog embryos and chickens can alter the levels of retinoic acid, which causes defects in the column similar to those detected medical increasingly human communities where agrochemicals are used. The acid, a type of vitamin A, is essential for cancer and trigger gene expression, the process by which the embryo cells into organs and limbs.
"If it is possible to reproduce in the laboratory, certainly what is happening in the countryside is much worse," Carrasco said. "And if it is much worse, and we suspect that is what we have to do is put under a magnifying glass." Their findings, published in the journal Chemical Research in Toxicology in 2010, were rejected by Monsanto, who said "no surprise given the methodology and exposure scenarios unreal". Monsanto said in response to questions from the AP, the analysis of the safety of chemicals should be done only in live animals and that injection of embryos "is less reliable and less relevant in assessing risks to humans" . "Glyphosate is less toxic than the repellent you put on the skin of the guys," said Pablo Vaquero, vice president of Monsanto in Argentina and director of corporate affairs of the company in the Southern Cone. "That said, would have to be a slip of responsibility for the proper use of products, because no way would spray in the mouth of the boys, and no environmental applicator should use a mosquito or crop duster without realizing environmental conditions and threats there from use of the product ". In the fields, the warnings are vastly ignored.
Tomasi for three years was routinely exposed to chemical pesticides to fill tanks that are used to spray crops. Now he is on the verge of death, victim of a polyneuropathy, a neurological disease that has no force, withered. "He prepared million liters poison without any protection such as gloves, masks or special clothing" he said. "I knew nothing of this. I learned after making contact with scientists. The poisons come in cans, are liquid concentrates with a lot of precautions to take when applying". But "no one takes precautions" Soy is sold at $ 500 a tonne and farmers planted where they can, often ignoring the recommendations of Monsanto and restrictions established in the laws of the provinces, as sprayed without warning to the population.
In Entre Ríos, the teachers said that the set limit not to spray within 50 meters at 18 schools were not respected and that 11 of these fields were sprayed in the middle class. Five teachers made complaints to the police this year. The Druetta teacher in Santa Fe reported that some students fainted when pesticides entered the classroom and drinking water from their village of Alvear is contaminated. Says the school lacks purified water and a neighbor kept frozen bodies of rabbits and birds were killed after spraying with the hope that someone will investigate. In the province of Buenos Aires is forbidden to load or prepare equipment for spraying in populated areas, but in towns like Rawson toxic sprayed across the street, where there are houses and a school, and toxic substances that overflow went to stop in a ditch.
Since 2010, he made an epidemiological study that included house to house 65,000 people in the province of Santa Fe and found that cancer rates are two to four times the national average, including breast cancer, prostate and lung. High levels of thyroid disorders and chronic respiratory problems were also tested. "It may be linked to pesticides," said Verzeñassi. "They toxicity tests on the first ingredient, but have never studied the interactions between all chemicals are applied. The medical María del Carmen Seveso, who runs for 33 years intensive care units and ethics committees in hospitals Chaco, was alarmed to see that, as birth certificates, birth defects of babies had quadrupled, from 19.1 to 85.3 per 10,000 births, since the planting of genetically modified crops approved a decade ago. Determined to find the causes, Seveso and his medical team surveyed 2,051 people in six villages of Chaco. He checked that there are more diseases and defects in villages where livestock farming villages.
In Avia Terai, 31% of respondents said having a family who contracted cancer in the last decade, compared with 3% of the neighboring cattle town of Charadai.
By visiting these villages surrounded by crops, the AP found traces of chemicals.
Claudia Sariski, whose house has no water, says he does not let his twin drink water stored in containers where there were chemicals that have in the backyard. But his chickens do, and she uses that water to wash clothes.
"Prepare seeds and poison at home. Not become aware of what they are doing," said Katherina Pardo surveyor. "It's very common, both in Avia Terai and in neighboring villages, using containers used to supply water to the house. As there is no drinking water, people use the same. They are very practical people."
The study detected diseases, according to the medical Seveso, previously not common, such as birth defects, deformities of the brain, spinal cords exposed, blindness or deafness, neurological damage, infertility and unusual skin problems.
Aixa Cano, a girl of five years, has hairy warts all over the body. Her neighbor Camila Veron, aged two, was born with multiple defects. Doctors told mothers that agrochemicals could be responsible. "I was told that was what it took, that is in the water because much venom thrown around here," said Camila's mother, Silvia Achaval, pointing to her daughter. "Those who say that throwing poison has no effect ... I do not know what the point is, because there is proof." It is almost impossible to prove that exposure to a particular chemical may have caused cancer or birth defects in a person. But, like other doctors, Seveso says government rigorous research results in Chaco necessitate.
His 68-page report, however, was shelved for a year at the Ministry of Health of Chaco. Finally, a copy of which was distributed by internet filtered. "There are things we do not talk, things are not heard," Seveso said. Scientists say that only larger studies, long-term, may dismiss agrochemicals to cause these diseases. "That is why we epidemiological studies of heart disease, problems with cigarette and all sorts of things," said Doug Gurian-Sherman, a former regulator of US Environmental Protection Agency is now working with the Union of Concerned Scientists. "If you have evidence that serious health problems, do not expect to have absolute proof to take action."
They spent all these years and no one takes responsibility, the evidence is not only laboratory and scientific, but experiential, namely:

1.   Fabian Tomasi a farmhand who worked many years in handling chemicals used on crops, photographed on March 29, 2013 at his residence in Basavilbaso in Argentina Entre Rios. Tomasi says he was never trained in handling these substances nor given protective equipment. Today you have polyneuropathy and is emaciated. (AP Photo / Natacha Pisarenko)




2.   In this photo taken March 31, 2013 sees Camila Veron, 2 years, affected by severe innate organic disorders and disability in front of his house. Avia Terai, Chaco province, Argentina. Doctors said Camila's mother, Silvia Achával, which is possibly due to agrochemicals. It is almost impossible to prove that exposure to a particular chemical caused cancer or congenital deformities an individual, but ... more







4.   Aixa Cano of five years and who has hairy warts all over the body, foografiada at home in Avia Terai, Argentina Chaco province, on April 1, 2013. Doctors can not explain the origin of warts, although suspect may be linked to the use of chemicals on crops in the area. (AP Photo / Natacha Pisarenko)



The photo of September 25, 2013 shows a sign of protest addressed to the President of Argentina Cristina Fernandez and the governor of Córdoba, José de la Sota. It hangs on the fence where Monsanto builds the largest in Latin America production plant seeds. All soybean and almost all corn and cotton in the country have been genetically modified in the last 17 years, since the US company promised greater ... more



Agrochemical containers discarded photographed in a recycling site quimil, Argentina province of Santiago del Estero, on May 2, 2013. Argentina today consume 382 million liters of chemicals, compared to 41 million in 1990. (AP Photo / Natacha Pisarenko)


                                          Lic. Miriam Giambuzzi

Bibliography

Infobae, October 22, 2013.
Gaudiano, E., Another reading of the history of environmental education in Latin America and the Caribbean. Rev.Tópicos in environmental education, Mexico, 1999.
Gorlieri, Max C., descriptive and informative report the impacts of pesticide application to soybean crops in Colonia Loma Senes, Pirané department, Formosa, March 2003.
Gudynas Eduardo, "Ecology Economics and Ethics of Sustainable Development", Editions Marina Viltre-CTERA, 2002.
Group of rural studies, Peasants Loma Senes, victims of GM, 2003.
Group of rural studies, Colonia Loma Senes: effects of industrial agriculture in a rural area of small family farmers 2003.
Leff, Enrique Coordinator. Environmental Training Network. "Environmental Justice. Construction and Defense of New Environmental, Cultural and Collective Rights in Latin America "Series Environmental Forums and Debates, UNEP, June, 2001.
Leff, Enrique Coordinator. Environmental Training Network. "Environmental Justice. Construction and Defense of New Environmental, Cultural and Collective Rights in Latin America "Series Environmental Forums and Debates, UNEP, June, 2001.
Solis Tréllez Heloise, "Community environmental education and foresight: a partnership for the future 1", Dossier Bibliographic, Module IX, "prospective Environmental Education, Science and" Buenos Aires, 2004.
Solis Tréllez Heloise, "Additional comments on contemporary environmental education" Bibliographic Dossier, Module IX, "prospective Environmental Education, Science and" Buenos Aires, 2004.
Solis Tréllez Heloise, "Environmental education and communication" Bibliographic Dossier, Module IX, "prospective Environmental Education, Science and" Buenos Aires, 2004.
www.biodiversidadla.org
w

Ámbito de Escritores sigue creciendo!! !!!!

Abre un nuevo espacio para geógrafos, para compartir, pensar e intercambiar opiniones.

Bienvenidos a este nuevo espacio para geógrafos, para todos los que quieran participar y compartir sus artículos con rigor científico, a favor de la divulgación del saber